Media Comment  
   
"It is particularly concerning to see how many consumers did not have their complaints upheld despite possessing an average of six grounds of complaint. There is clearly a large gap between the experience of consumers and the way companies appear to be treating them. "

"Insurance companies creamed off huge commissions and charges in the past, but they are now trying to blame problems on the stockmarket for the failure of these schemes. There was a culture of greed throughout the industry. People right at the top were driving the sale of endowment policies on the bag of bogus promises that they would pay off home loans and provide a tax-free lump sum.

Individual consumers are being left to pursue recompense themselves, and we believe a large number of legitimate claims are being rejected by insurers."

Sheila McKechnie, Director, Consumers’ Association



 
  Endowment Bombshell – Now three out of four policies will fall short  
   
The endowment mortgage scandal is claiming millions more victims than anyone realised. Insurance industry experts claim the proportion of endowment policies which will not cover loans has rocketed from 46 to 75 percent in just three years. Excessive charges imposed by the insurance giants combined with stock market turmoil have left 7 million policies heading for a shortfall estimated to total £21 billion. A quarter of the endowments maturing this year are failing to deliver the target sum.

The reality for victims is that they may not have enough money to pay off their home loan, threatening poverty in old age or even homelessness.

Daily Mail – 27 September 2003


 
  FT Money – Mis-selling: Millions face big endowment deficit  
   


Millions of homeowners face big shortfalls on their mortgages in one of the financial services industry’s longest running mis-selling scandals.

Seventy per cent of mortgage endowment policy holders – of which there are more than 10 million – will have to find an average of £7,000 to make up a shortfall on their loans, says the Association of British Insurers.
Many were sold policies on the promise that not only would their mortgage be paid off years in advance of the maturity date , they would also get a lump sum. The risks were often not explained. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) reacted by implementing guidelines on how firms should handle complaints and by setting up investigations into firms that were thought guilty of widespread mis-selling in the past.

Financial Times - September 20 2003


 
  Cheated out of justice – "A fair process? It doesn’t exist"  
   
John Dawson's complaints about his endowments with Provident Mutual took months, involved dozens of letters to numerous organisations – and achieved precisely nothing. "There is nothing I can do," John says. "We are led to believe that there is a fair complaints process, but in practice it doesn’t exist." The process is just too daunting.

Financial Mail on Sunday - July 6 2003


Investor Compensation Plc comment – Unfortunately those people who choose to represent themselves often fall at the first hurdle. Investor Compensation Plc has the experience and required in-depth knowledge to ensure your complaint is taken seriously and in many cases compensation will be paid.


 
  Back to top


   





 


Investor Compensation has also successfully obtained significant amounts of compensation for those investors who have been mis-sold many other types of financial product. Examples include Splits (Zeros), SCARPS, precipice bonds, income drawdown and equities. Please contact us for further information.

 
Investor Compensation